Somehow the VAT left to be paid in annual balance is not equal to Draft VAT Declaration for the 4th year-quarter. Those numbers should be the same but they differ every year slightly but this year at about 19€.
When I calculate by hand the Draft VAT Declaration is correct but the annual not although their base is the same numbers.
Does anyone experience the same problem or is there a bug commonly known?
Eric
That depends on many things. To name a few:
This is most likely something to discuss with your accountant as it looks like you need either to setup your taxes properly or to reconcile your tax account or both.
How do you calculate it? Can you show some example with fake numbers to see what’s the calculation method?
I discovered were the problem is; in the sheet ‘concept BTW aangifte’ for the Dutch VAT the items with 9% tax are not included in the automatic calculated total of the pre-tax (5b voorbelasting).
Is there a way to correct this?
You mean by v22.1.3 the version of the VAT sheet? I don’t know, where can I find the versionnumber of this in Manager? And where can I find version v22.1.3?
No, of the Manager application. The Concept BTW Aangifte doesn’t have a version #
After 5 years being member/user shouldn’t you know that the download page is here? 
Thank you for the help so far; I updated Manager but the problem still remains; the 9% items are not in the totals of the VAT sheet.
Can you show a screenshot of the 9% edit page under Instellingen > BTW-tarieven? It should look like this:
Please show the tax-codes in settings.
@Mark I just installed a new test business with Nederland as the localisation country. Without changing anything I wen to the BTW-Tarieven 9% page and noted that “rekening” is showing a code rather than "af te dragen BTW. There is thus an error in this localisation and maybe @Hennie could look into this as I assume he has worked on that localisation.
Update: Deleting the “6aad…71” entry let the proper account appear. Not sure why it would not default to that. By the way all the BTW_Tarieven show the wrong rekening and need deleting to show the right one. Maybe the localization can be improved to avoid this.
Yes, correct, but the VAT sheet works fine. All rates show a UUID code, e.g., this is the 21% VAT rate:
The important thing is to check that the correct VAT rate is selected in the field Concept BTW Aangifte at the bottom as Lubos mentioned in this post.
@eko It is my experience that quite a lot of users start using Manager the wrong way and when it doesn’t work the way they expect it, they then start complaining that Manager doesn’t work the proper way or that there are errors in whatever file.
The best you can do is sent me a private message and attach a backup file of Manager, I can have a look at how you have setup things and I can than correct it if wrong.
Your screenshot indicates that you have setup the VAT-codes the wrong way.
@Hennie I was trying to figure out what could cause the problem of @EricM As such I did a test installation with the Nederland localisation. Then checked the BTW 9% in settings-BTW aangifte and notice it was not assigned to the “Af te dragen BTW” account even though this exists in the Chart of accounts and should have been assigned properly.
I am not a new user, nor do I face these kind of problems, but thanks for the potential to help where needed although I understood that forum was the place to exchange information so we can share and learn.
The Af te dragen BTW in the chart of accounts is a temporary one. You however have to create a new account in the rekeningschema and allocate the VAT codes to that newly vreated account.
I don’t think that is necessary as it is a built-in account, which cannot be deleted. The only reason I see to create a different Tax payable account is when creating a new business (or starting a new fiscal year for an existing business) and you have a pending balance of Tax payable because in built-in account doesn’t allow you to insert an opening balance.
No, @Mark, the developer has clearly stated the built-in account is a placeholder and should not be used. I personally think that is confusing, but would certainly follow his instructions.
I agree with Tut. It is exactly what I suggested to do and what Lubos described in the thread “No localization for existing business”.
