I would expect the nett sales/purchase figure, so without tax in the column Total Sales given the header Tax on Sales for the next column.
Also, these sales/purchase figures could then be compared with the sales/purchase figures in the PL.
I think that Tax Transactions report must have the same columns of Tax Summary report and also must come up with the same results.
At this time, due to the fact that reverse charge is reflected only in Tax Summary report, Tax Transactions report don’t pass the “exam” of our chartered accountant and of our legal auditor.
Tax reports are designed to support Tax reporting, they are not financial reports.
For example, the Australian worksheet requires .
The Tax Transaction Report’s headings and figures support this worksheet requirement.
Furthermore, tax reporting Sales and Purchases aren’t necessarily P&L Sales & Purchases.
For example, the buying of Inventory is a tax reporting Purchase, but not a P&L purchase as it’s posted to the BS.
I agree, it does seem strange that a “Summary” report contains more information then the “Transaction” report which it is summarising.