Well, then how come the manager did show partially uncategorized transaction in the uncategorised list previously? This was the consept of manager last years at least since from 2015 to 2020 as I’ve been using this for last 5 years.
And if this was not MANAGER’S FAULT, when you guys update or change the program it should’ve been listed and somehow mantioned in your updated list.
However I don’t believe you guys specifically changed this function specifically but somehow it was on the way when you guys coding something else.
The concept is even if I categorize one transaction being split into multiple lines, if all the lines are not categorized, it should show up as uncategorized transaction as part of its transaction is still suspense, otherwise manager should not allow me to split it in multiple lines.
It’s not a mistake but manager allowed me to do so otherwise manager must prevent for me not to make the mistake.
Manager used to work like what I explained until just few months ago. If you guys keep saying it was not supposed to do this way, then the manager got this bug last 5 years at least? However, I believe unless manager does not allow to split one transaction into multiple lines, it must show unfinished categorizing transactions in the uncategorized list.
This is not only for suspense transaction but also other suspense items. it’s all mixed up in this page so not so conveient to look for uncategorized transaction here. Also it more make sense that any uncategorized transaction(partially not done yet) must show in uncategorized transaction list too as it belongs to transactions as well.
Also another reason why I don’t want to use/look at the suspense account is that there are items that are not actually suspense but they show up in this account so I cannot only track suspense items.
Below is the quick screen shot.
The last transaction in the suspense account was actually categorised correctly however it still shows up in the suspense account.
This never bother me as I didn’t use this to be honest however, this would be an issue if you insist I was using the manager in a wrong way and now need to use this.

