Report date range differs from report content

I am generating a report with a few comparative tables. The date range on the report heading only displays the first column’s date range. Not sure if this is how it is supposed to be. If it is, then I accept it. Just curious if I am doing something wrong.

These are my comparative columns:
Date 2

This is what is displayed on the report. The highlighted being the “to date” that should be in the report date range.
Date 1

No one can “guess” what report you are trying to generate. Please at least tellus the steps with screenshots if possible. With the current info I don’t think anyone could help you.

That’s the way it has always been

1 Like

@eko, this is with all report that has comparative columns that I have tried. I tried a few:

  • Profit & Loss statement
  • Cash Flow
  • Trial Balance
  • Changes in Equity
  • Tax Reconciliation

They all only display the first column’s date range.

@Joe91, thank you for the reply. If that is what it is, so be it. It is not a deal breaker, just a nice to have.

Notice that additional columns are and have always been referred to as comparative columns. The header refers to the primary column, which is in bold text.

@Tut, I understand what you mean. As I mentioned, it is not a deal breaker. Was just wondering if it was something I did wrong.

1 Like

Not at all. It’s just how reports work.