What has been implemented provides excellent flexibility and I can definitely use it to do all that I need to do.
For my use case though it would make more sense if accounts were grouped above the individual fixed asset level.
Currently accounts are associated at the individual fixed asset level
It would make more sense for my use case it I just indicated the fixed asset “Desk” was in the “Furniture” fixed asset group.
Then probably at the Control account level, the Fixed asset group/class “Furniture” was defined to use specific accounts for “at cost”, “accumulated depreciation”, “depreciation expense”, and “loss on disposal”.
Clearly this is a low priority as the existing solution works. Just thought it would make it better again for my use case. Others may not want consistent fixed asset grouping though.