# Wrong behavior of the reference field

**URL:** <https://forum.manager.io/t/wrong-behavior-of-the-reference-field/43678>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [October 22, 2022, 5:19am UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/wrong-behavior-of-the-reference-field/43678 "2022-10-22T05:19:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Morhf164](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.manager.io/morhf164/32/36354_2.png) [@Morhf164](https://forum.manager.io/u/Morhf164)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2022, 10:09am UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/wrong-behavior-of-the-reference-field/43678/6 "2022-10-22T10:09:57Z")

</div>

Thanks @Tut  
I know that

But the mistake that happens is that when I chose the sort according to the reference, the sort appears wrongly, as I attached to this with pictures

for example: The sort appears  
1  
10  
100  
101  
102  
etc

And the right thing should be  
1  
2  
3  
4  
etc

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.manager.io/t/wrong-behavior-of-the-reference-field/43678)._