# Request for improvement to bank reconciliation format

**URL:** <https://forum.manager.io/t/request-for-improvement-to-bank-reconciliation-format/25155>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [November 2, 2019, 4:00pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/request-for-improvement-to-bank-reconciliation-format/25155 "2019-11-02T16:00:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Patch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/a183cd/32.png) [@Patch](https://forum.manager.io/u/Patch)\
**Post date:** [January 16, 2020, 1:25am UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/request-for-improvement-to-bank-reconciliation-format/25155/6 "2020-01-16T01:25:17Z")

</div>

> [@New Bank Reconciliation Tab](https://forum.manager.io/t/new-bank-reconciliation-tab/25337/14):
>
> The difference is it shows what you have done (so already OK) not what you have not done (so needs to be highlighted). I agree the new structure has the ability to generalise to other areas, but we have lost something of value.

Thinking about it further, this could be solved by a different default sort order:

- At the top of the list show the most recent reconciliation for each account, sorted by account name (or account number if shown)

- Then list all other reconciliations (probably in same order or reverses chronological order)

- Other sort orders could then be selected by clicking on date or account heading

This would result in similar behavior as is used elsewhere in Manager where it shows the most relevant items at the top of the list.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.manager.io/t/request-for-improvement-to-bank-reconciliation-format/25155)._