# Recommendation for standardization of transaction layout

**URL:** https://forum.manager.io/t/recommendation-for-standardization-of-transaction-layout/31910
**Category:** Uncategorized
**Created:** [December 6, 2020, 10:45pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/recommendation-for-standardization-of-transaction-layout/31910 "2020-12-06T22:45:52Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 33

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![lubos](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.manager.io/lubos/32/62798_2.png) [@lubos](https://forum.manager.io/u/lubos)
#### Post date: [June 27, 2022, 9:35pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/recommendation-for-standardization-of-transaction-layout/31910/33 "2022-06-27T21:35:10Z")

</div>

@Ealfardan we should still have totals under each column where applicable. Mostly because this will allow us to show totals even for columns that do not contribute to transaction total in any way. For example `Qty` column or various custom fields (both feature requests in `ideas` category).

This brings me why repeat all that again in vertical total section. But we could. Especially when transaction has columns with various totals but only some of them are part of the transaction total calculation.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.manager.io/t/recommendation-for-standardization-of-transaction-layout/31910)._