# PAID in FULL but outstanding

**URL:** <https://forum.manager.io/t/paid-in-full-but-outstanding/6464>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [July 28, 2016, 12:04pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/paid-in-full-but-outstanding/6464 "2016-07-28T12:04:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lubos](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.manager.io/lubos/32/62798_2.png) [@lubos](https://forum.manager.io/u/lubos)\
**Post date:** [July 28, 2016, 1:47pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/paid-in-full-but-outstanding/6464/10 "2016-07-28T13:47:04Z")

</div>

Sorry about this. It’s fixed in the latest version (16.7.78).

It was a regression bug related to this enhancement:

> [@\[16.7.73\] Categorization against customer and supplier accounts more intuitive](https://forum.manager.io/t/16-7-73-categorization-against-customer-and-supplier-accounts-more-intuitive/6462):
>
> Previously if payment was to be allocated against the invoice, user would select Accounts receivable account, then select invoice. [image] If payment was to be allocated against customer, then user would select Customer credits account, then customer would have to be selected. [image] Although from accounting point of view, this approach was working. It was not intuitive. The latest version is changing this. It is no longer possible to select Customer credits account because drop-down to se…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.manager.io/t/paid-in-full-but-outstanding/6464)._
