# Layout problems with Reference fields on transaction forms

**URL:** https://forum.manager.io/t/layout-problems-with-reference-fields-on-transaction-forms/41459
**Category:** Uncategorized
**Created:** [June 12, 2022, 12:38pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/layout-problems-with-reference-fields-on-transaction-forms/41459 "2022-06-12T12:38:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 8
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tut](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.manager.io/tut/32/3286_2.png) [@Tut](https://forum.manager.io/u/Tut)
#### Post date: [June 12, 2022, 12:38pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/layout-problems-with-reference-fields-on-transaction-forms/41459/1 "2022-06-12T12:38:53Z")

</div>

In version 22.6.9.83, the `Reference` field is overly wide. The `Due date` field is also misaligned. For example, on a sales invoice:

 ![Screen Shot 2022-06-12 at 6.24.24 AM](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/uploads/manager1/original/3X/9/3/93e634955819428eeadf4de452ed92d8b0407e8f.png)

This problem also occurs on all other transaction types where a `Reference` field is used except:

- Receipts
- Purchase Invoices
- Debit Notes
- Goods Receipts
- Inventory Transfers
- Inventory Write-Offs
- Production Orders
- Payslips
- Depreciation Entries
- Amortization Entries
- Journal Entries

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![eko](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/a8b319/32.png) [@eko](https://forum.manager.io/u/eko)
#### Post date: [June 12, 2022, 2:25pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/layout-problems-with-reference-fields-on-transaction-forms/41459/2 "2022-06-12T14:25:14Z")

</div>

I am not saying that this is not an issue or bug that you experience because you show evidence. However, I can not replicate this on Ubuntu 20.04 Server Edition and on MacOS. Maybe it has to do with your browser?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tut](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.manager.io/tut/32/3286_2.png) [@Tut](https://forum.manager.io/u/Tut)
#### Post date: [June 12, 2022, 3:35pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/layout-problems-with-reference-fields-on-transaction-forms/41459/3 "2022-06-12T15:35:06Z")

</div>

No, this was on the desktop edition under macOS. There have been other layout issues recently that were hard to replicate and seemed to be operating system specific. (These were not discussed on the public forum, but in moderator-to-system-administrator communications.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![lubos](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.manager.io/lubos/32/62798_2.png) [@lubos](https://forum.manager.io/u/lubos)
#### Post date: [June 12, 2022, 9:56pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/layout-problems-with-reference-fields-on-transaction-forms/41459/4 "2022-06-12T21:56:32Z")

</div>

Are you saying this issue is visible on `Sales Invoice` form but on `Purchase Invoice` form it’s good? Or that the issue is on `Payments` form but not on `Receipts` form? Are you sure the exclusion list if complete? Which forms are actually affected?

I’ll try to figure it out what’s different even though can’t reproduce the issue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tut](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.manager.io/tut/32/3286_2.png) [@Tut](https://forum.manager.io/u/Tut)
#### Post date: [June 12, 2022, 10:33pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/layout-problems-with-reference-fields-on-transaction-forms/41459/5 "2022-06-12T22:33:25Z")

</div>

My original bug description misled you because form defaults in the test business used varied from tab to tab. As I was verifying the results of my earlier tests, I discovered the real trigger.

The problem occurs whenever the checkbox for _Automatic_ is checked in the `Reference` field. If the box is unchecked, the field reverts to normal size. And if a reference number has been entered, it displays at normal size, regardless of how the reference was set. In other words, it is the presence of the checked box that causes the behavior. For example, a receipt without the check:

![Screen Shot 2022-06-12 at 4.27.26 PM](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/uploads/manager1/original/3X/4/7/474a2f4879ff7d7fbed86d1a01298218b06337e1.png)

and with the check:

 ![Screen Shot 2022-06-12 at 4.27.38 PM](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/uploads/manager1/original/3X/4/f/4f0fe2f6ee37a771127c220c2ddeb414e833468d.png)

As far as I can tell, the behavior is consistent across all tabs with the `Reference` field.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![lubos](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.manager.io/lubos/32/62798_2.png) [@lubos](https://forum.manager.io/u/lubos)
#### Post date: [June 12, 2022, 10:34pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/layout-problems-with-reference-fields-on-transaction-forms/41459/6 "2022-06-12T22:34:20Z")

</div>

OK that makes more sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![lubos](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.manager.io/lubos/32/62798_2.png) [@lubos](https://forum.manager.io/u/lubos)
#### Post date: [June 20, 2022, 10:51pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/layout-problems-with-reference-fields-on-transaction-forms/41459/7 "2022-06-20T22:51:01Z")

</div>

Should be fixed in the latest version (22.6.20)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ealfardan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.manager.io/ealfardan/32/63166_2.png) [@Ealfardan](https://forum.manager.io/u/Ealfardan)
#### Post date: [July 5, 2026, 8:13pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/layout-problems-with-reference-fields-on-transaction-forms/41459/8 "2026-07-05T20:13:03Z")

</div>

Uncategorized topics older than 3 years with no recent activity
