# Inventory cost inclusive of freight and tax

**URL:** <https://forum.manager.io/t/inventory-cost-inclusive-of-freight-and-tax/57806>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [October 22, 2024, 6:38pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/inventory-cost-inclusive-of-freight-and-tax/57806 "2024-10-22T18:38:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Flakily8674](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/58f4c7/32.png) [@Flakily8674](https://forum.manager.io/u/Flakily8674)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2024, 8:51pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/inventory-cost-inclusive-of-freight-and-tax/57806/5 "2024-10-22T20:51:22Z")

</div>

I think the confusion is that I’m looking to use Landed Cost as the Inventory - cost whereas by default, Manager uses COGS.

I found this solution that seem to work well [Landed Cost - Multiple Vendors - #6 by Brucanna](https://forum.manager.io/t/landed-cost-multiple-vendors/10646/6). Using contra accounts to make payable much more clear.

 ![Screenshot 2024-10-22 155008](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/uploads/manager1/original/3X/2/c/2ce32cd9e3b47a9c886452e29b6e6b363a75e2bb.jpeg)  
 ![Screenshot 2024-10-22 155043](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/uploads/manager1/original/3X/7/1/7192a1ec09b36413d9b9bbc0ae097fa5f018c541.jpeg)

Does anyone foresee any issues with recording the invoices this way?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.manager.io/t/inventory-cost-inclusive-of-freight-and-tax/57806)._
