I infer you mean to say the business which collected $3,000 was overdrawn on its deposit account and that its bank will charge it $300 interest for covering the overdraft.
Using that assumption, this illustrative example may help to clarify;
The bank will assess the interest by creating a receivable and recognizing revenue (interest charged to customers is operating revenue, ASC 230), as on row 4. Regardless of what the business does in Manager, the bank will allocate the $3,000 deposit as on row 5, crediting the $300 receivable and putting the rest in the businessās deposit account (āsplits the creditā).
Provided the business knowsāor can calculateāthe interest it will be assessed for its overdraft, it should create a payable and incur the expense (interest paid is an operating expense, also ASC 230), as on row 13. When it deposits its cash, it will satisfy its payable and debit the remainder to their deposit account (they āsplit the debitā), as on row 15.
The balance of the deposit account on both the bankās books and businessās books, reconcile (ā[C]ā).
In the event the business can not calculate, or lookup online, what its interest is, it will record a balance of $3,000 in its deposit account, even though the bank has the balance at $2,700. The business will learn its interest charge when it receives its statement. By way of example, the bank will provide something as such;
This may make it appear to the business all this activity occurred within their Deposit Account, but you can trace each amount to a discrete account of the bankās books.
At this point the business must go through its normal reconciliation process; it should detect the $300 charge that is not on its books, and post an adjusting entry by debiting expenses and crediting their deposit account.
An audit nightmare, why, because an external auditor validates that the customerās transactions on the statement are an exact match with the Bankās GL account transactions.
This is not an audit nightmare. I am a licensed and practicing external auditor with a major US accounting firm; we deal with situations such as this almost everyday. This is what we would expect to see when auditing either a borrower or a lender. We do not expect two companyās books to be an exact match.
Now perhaps you would like to explain these two things:
I may not be reading that as intended, but it seems as if you are frustrated trying to understand the application. I know how you feel; with me itās process costing (I still canāt do it by memory alone).
Like I said, Iām happy to continue the discussion if you feel it will help, but weāve gone from a specific userās issue to broad principles of debt transactions; we are beyond scope. Just message me directly. Until then, stay healthy and safe!