# Be able to hide app features that are not used anymore

**URL:** <https://forum.manager.io/t/be-able-to-hide-app-features-that-are-not-used-anymore/39277>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [January 12, 2022, 11:03am UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/be-able-to-hide-app-features-that-are-not-used-anymore/39277 "2022-01-12T11:03:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AntonisV](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.manager.io/antonisv/32/6914_2.png) [@AntonisV](https://forum.manager.io/u/AntonisV)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2022, 3:49pm UTC](https://forum.manager.io/t/be-able-to-hide-app-features-that-are-not-used-anymore/39277/18 "2022-01-14T15:49:31Z")

</div>

Freedom of speech is a thing, but politeness is another.

“My needs are more important that yours”, that’s what I read all in all.

In my use case, Manager’s accuracy is fine. I never wanted the app to be more precise.

If it was core functionality, then he wouldn’t use the application any way.

> [@Patch](#):
>
> I my opinion Manager is missing core functionality, by which I mean basic accounting accuracy and jurisdiction required reporting compliance (electronic data interchange, arithmetic in localisation to enable calculations based on jurisdictions intermediate values)

> [@eko](#):
>
> This opinion could include pointing out that it is of lesser priority than other ideas

> [@AntonisV](#):
>
> If you have analysed it somewhere else please give us a link, and don’t analyse it here.

I asked a link for the other Idea, and didn’t got any.

I also saw @Patch posting about voting: [Forum ideas voting](https://forum.manager.io/t/forum-ideas-voting/39299).

In that post @sharpdrivetek replied:

> [@Forum ideas voting](https://forum.manager.io/t/forum-ideas-voting/39299/3):
>
> In my opinion down voting would never help. Users are simply going to down vote an idea when they find it inapplicable to their business or when they do not fully understand the idea. Lets just take a moment to review our experience on the forum where we constantly find users who are unaware or ignorant of the forum rules.
> 
> It might help to introduce a mandatory explanation before a user’s down vote is accepted. But that is just going to give a headache to forum moderators and waste the limited resources available for Manager development.

Consider now that Patch says that my idea is

> [@Patch](#):
>
> Getting the program to look pretty

Clearly suggests that he doesn’t understand that this feature is about “Ease Of Use”. Probably he has other priorities, and he is just downvoting like sharpdrivetek says.

In any case I strongly believe that voting should return so that anyone can vote an Idea. Even let downvoting like Patch said. It’s better because it doesn’t ignite hijacking other’s ideas posts with one’s own priorities.

See what happened ? We are talking all this time for every other thing instead talking about the Topic.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.manager.io/t/be-able-to-hide-app-features-that-are-not-used-anymore/39277)._